Ken Turkel on Dominion's "dynamite" case against Fox News "The Anti-Homosexuality Act passed by the Ugandan Parliament yesterday would undermine fundamental human rights of all Ugandans and could reverse gains in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Then you have a report that's to the contrary. And rarely do you see this much clear indication that a broadcaster, a writer, was disclosing their state of mind. "I think the legal issues will remain the same. "What is interesting about this case right now, keeping in mind that Judge Davis already denied a motion to dismiss," Turkel added. This is usually why these sorts of cases are hard to litigate, Turkel continued - because "you are trying to move what someone was thinking, what they knew, when there is rarely any direct evidence of that." RELATED: Fox News CEO: Our reporters who fact checked election lies 'don't understand our viewers' But there is really no legal impact to if from a malice perspective because the law is always going to focus on the mindset, or what I like to call the undisclosed mental process of the speaker." "I think in their opposition to the summary judgment motion that Fox filed, Dominion started with an excerpt from that testimony, because at the end of the day we tell stories and the stories have to make sense and have to be compelling and persuasive," said Turkel. And then you have this emerging testimony of Rupert Murdoch, which is dynamite. But there is so much here, so much communication. Internal messaging rooms, things like that. "Breaking it down, the thoughts that I have are, first, you rarely see that much paper in one of these cases. "When we say this, looking at what's been released, there is an awful lot of documentary evidence, text messages, emails, quite a bit to digest," said Turkel. Dominion Voting Systems has "dynamite" evidence in their $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News, said Ken Turkel, the lawyer behind Hulk Hogan's suit against Gawker, on CNN Wednesday morning.įox News continues to maintain its coverage was not defamatory and Dominion's examples of communications between Fox executives and on-air personalities are being taken out of context - but at this point, the evidence appears to be quite strong, Turkel argued.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |